40 minutes agoShareSavePaul SeddonPolitical reporter andJoshua NevettPolitical reporterShareSaveRobert Jenrick has hit out at “activist” judges, as he set out Conservative plans to hand ministers a bigger role in filling judicial vacancies.In his party conference speech, the shadow justice secretary claimed judges with links to pro-migrant charities had undermined public trust in the courts.He pledged that if the Tories win the next election, they would reverse Blair-era changes that restricted ministerial involvement in judicial appointments.Wielding a judge’s wig as a prop, he promised the move would stop judges “who blur the line between adjudication and activism”.In an address that strayed outside his policy brief, Jenrick, who stood for leadership of the party last year and who continues to attract speculation about his ambitions, hit out at Labour’s record in areas including climate targets and the economy.In a traditional conference dig at his Labour opposite number, he poked fun at various incorrect answers given by Justice Secretary David Lammy during his 2009 appearance on Celebrity Mastermind.But he also took aim at Sir Keir Starmer, telling delegates the prime minister was combining the leadership style of fictional office manger David Brent with the “administrative grip of Blackadder’s Baldrick”, and joked that that former Conservative prime minister Liz Truss, who was in office for just 49 days, would need “paying by the minute” to be in the Big Brother house.In recent months, Jenrick has become increasingly critical of court rulings in immigration cases, particularly appeals against failed asylum applications.In his address in Manchester, he told party activists he had found “dozens of judges” who had “broadcast their open borders views” on social media, or “spent their whole careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country”.He did not name anyone, but added that they dishonoured “generations of independent jurists who came before them, as well as the “vast majority” of judges, who “respect and revere” the wig as a symbol of their role as an “unbiased mediator”.”The public rightly ask: how independent are they?” he added.’Proper role’Jenrick announced that if elected, the Conservatives would abolish the Judicial Appoints Commission, a body set up by New Labour in 2006 in a bid to boost the transparency and independence of judicial appointments.Establishing the commission significantly curbed the role of the justice secretary in appointing judges in England and Wales, handing them a limited veto over nominees put forward by the commission.Further changes under the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition stripped them of their power to reject nominees for courts below the High Court.Abolishing the commission, Jenrick argued, would “restore the proper role of our judiciary, putting ultimate power back where it belongs, in the hands of Parliament, and ministers”.He added that the the role of appointing judges would return to the justice secretary, a cabinet minister, who would be “instructed to never permit activists of any political hue to don the wig, ever again”.The party says it would also require judges to to publicly register their “charitable affiliations,” and give extra powers to the watchdog responsible for investigating professional behaviour among judges. It has also announced plans to abolish another Blair-era body, the Sentencing Council, which issues sentencing guidelines to judges in England and Wales.It follows a “two-tier” justice row earlier this year over guidance on pre-sent …
Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source
[mwai_chat context=”Let’s have a discussion about this article:nn40 minutes agoShareSavePaul SeddonPolitical reporter andJoshua NevettPolitical reporterShareSaveRobert Jenrick has hit out at “activist” judges, as he set out Conservative plans to hand ministers a bigger role in filling judicial vacancies.In his party conference speech, the shadow justice secretary claimed judges with links to pro-migrant charities had undermined public trust in the courts.He pledged that if the Tories win the next election, they would reverse Blair-era changes that restricted ministerial involvement in judicial appointments.Wielding a judge’s wig as a prop, he promised the move would stop judges “who blur the line between adjudication and activism”.In an address that strayed outside his policy brief, Jenrick, who stood for leadership of the party last year and who continues to attract speculation about his ambitions, hit out at Labour’s record in areas including climate targets and the economy.In a traditional conference dig at his Labour opposite number, he poked fun at various incorrect answers given by Justice Secretary David Lammy during his 2009 appearance on Celebrity Mastermind.But he also took aim at Sir Keir Starmer, telling delegates the prime minister was combining the leadership style of fictional office manger David Brent with the “administrative grip of Blackadder’s Baldrick”, and joked that that former Conservative prime minister Liz Truss, who was in office for just 49 days, would need “paying by the minute” to be in the Big Brother house.In recent months, Jenrick has become increasingly critical of court rulings in immigration cases, particularly appeals against failed asylum applications.In his address in Manchester, he told party activists he had found “dozens of judges” who had “broadcast their open borders views” on social media, or “spent their whole careers fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country”.He did not name anyone, but added that they dishonoured “generations of independent jurists who came before them, as well as the “vast majority” of judges, who “respect and revere” the wig as a symbol of their role as an “unbiased mediator”.”The public rightly ask: how independent are they?” he added.’Proper role’Jenrick announced that if elected, the Conservatives would abolish the Judicial Appoints Commission, a body set up by New Labour in 2006 in a bid to boost the transparency and independence of judicial appointments.Establishing the commission significantly curbed the role of the justice secretary in appointing judges in England and Wales, handing them a limited veto over nominees put forward by the commission.Further changes under the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition stripped them of their power to reject nominees for courts below the High Court.Abolishing the commission, Jenrick argued, would “restore the proper role of our judiciary, putting ultimate power back where it belongs, in the hands of Parliament, and ministers”.He added that the the role of appointing judges would return to the justice secretary, a cabinet minister, who would be “instructed to never permit activists of any political hue to don the wig, ever again”.The party says it would also require judges to to publicly register their “charitable affiliations,” and give extra powers to the watchdog responsible for investigating professional behaviour among judges. It has also announced plans to abolish another Blair-era body, the Sentencing Council, which issues sentencing guidelines to judges in England and Wales.It follows a “two-tier” justice row earlier this year over guidance on pre-sent …nnDiscussion:nn” ai_name=”RocketNews AI: ” start_sentence=”Can I tell you more about this article?” text_input_placeholder=”Type ‘Yes'”]
