Europe’s most effective tool to cut greenhouse gas emissions ‘risks being weakened’

by | Jul 26, 2026 | Climate Change

Europe’s most effective tool to cut greenhouse gas emissions ‘risks being weakened’

The European Commission unveiled a comprehensive review of the European Union’s emissions trading system (ETS), the bloc’s central mechanism for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The proposals include modifications that would extend deadlines for phasing out free pollution permits for heavy industries, slow the annual reduction of available permits, and provide companies with more flexible pathways to meet climate obligations.

The ETS, operational since 2005, has been credited with reducing emissions from major European polluters by 47% compared to 2005 levels by 2023. Under the system, companies must purchase permits to emit greenhouse gases, creating financial incentives for investments in cleaner energy and production methods. The review was initiated to align the ETS with the EU’s target of reducing emissions by 90% by 2040 and achieving carbon neutrality by mid-century.

The commission’s proposals face competing pressures. Ten EU member states, including Italy, have called for reforms arguing the ETS drives up energy costs and disadvantages European industries against competitors receiving state subsidies elsewhere. In response, the proposal extends free allowance periods for polluting sectors like steel and cement until 2038 rather than 2034, and reduces the rate of annual permit reductions from the current 4.3% to 3.7% after 2031 and 1.7% after 2036.

Critics contend the reforms would undermine the system’s effectiveness. Environmental advocates warn that slowing permit reductions could allow an additional 2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, jeopardizing the 2040 climate target. The proposal also extends the ETS to municipal waste and aviation, and introduces coverage for private jets for the first time.

The draft legislation requires approval from all 27 EU member states and the European Parliament. Commission officials defend the changes as necessary to maintain industrial investment within Europe while meeting climate objectives, though industry groups noted concerns about increased bureaucratic complexity and uncertainty regarding international carbon credits.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI