US judge rules against Trump’s effort to deport pro-Palestinian students

by | Aug 29, 2026 | World

US judge rules against Trump’s effort to deport pro-Palestinian students

A federal district judge in California issued a decision rejecting the Trump administration’s deportation efforts targeting international students engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy. The 90-page ruling found that the Departments of State and Homeland Security had violated constitutional protections when they sought to remove noncitizen students based on their political speech and activism regarding Gaza.

The case centered on visa revocations and detentions that began following activism by Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil in March 2025. The plaintiff group included journalists from Stanford University’s student newspaper who reported self-censoring due to fears of visa revocation, along with two anonymous foreign nationals who stated they felt pressured to silence themselves on political matters. The litigation was filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Free Expression against Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other officials.

The Trump administration had justified its enforcement actions under provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act that allow the secretary of state to exclude foreign nationals whose presence could have serious foreign policy consequences. However, the judge found this standard was being applied in a discriminatory manner targeting specific political viewpoints. The court observed that visa revocations had occurred specifically when noncitizens criticized the government or causes it supported, describing the enforcement pattern as “standardless” and constituting serious discrimination.

The ruling emphasized that freedom of speech protections extend to both citizens and noncitizens in the United States, and that self-censorship resulting from government retaliation undermines democratic principles. Legal advocates hailed the decision as affirming that free speech rights are fundamental rather than privileges that can be conditioned on immigration status.

This ruling followed a similar decision in Massachusetts in September 2025, where another federal judge had also found First Amendment violations in the government’s attempted detentions and deportations of international students and academics based on pro-Palestinian advocacy.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI