He tried to eliminate FEMA. Now he says the Trump administration has changed course

by | Sep 3, 2026 | Top Stories

He tried to eliminate FEMA. Now he says the Trump administration has changed course

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is no longer facing elimination efforts from the Trump administration, according to David Richardson, who served as the agency’s acting administrator throughout much of 2025. President Trump had initially expressed strong opposition to FEMA in his second term, calling for the agency to be eliminated and stating his belief that it was ineffective. This rhetoric was reinforced by top administration officials, including the Department of Homeland Security Secretary at the time.

Richardson was brought in to lead FEMA with an explicit mandate to dramatically reduce its size. He arrived at the agency with a plan to cut headquarters staff from approximately 6,000 employees to no more than 2,000 by the end of November 2025, framing it as a small-government initiative. However, Richardson says that within months of taking over the position, the administration’s focus began to shift. When he presented a downsizing proposal to DHS leadership, it was not approved, and the administration appointed a council of emergency experts to examine potential reforms instead.

Current FEMA employees report that fears of wholesale abolition or mass layoffs have diminished in recent months, though the earlier elimination efforts have had lingering consequences. Disaster recovery operations remain understaffed, and there have been delays in distributing recovery funds to affected states. A Government Accountability Office report raised concerns about whether the agency has sufficient staffing levels. Additionally, the administration’s attempts to cut FEMA programs have faced legal obstacles, including court challenges to the termination of a major disaster preparedness grant program.

Disaster policy experts and former FEMA leadership have criticized the attempted downsizing as misguided. Deanne Criswell, who led FEMA under the previous administration, argued that indiscriminate staff cuts harm disaster survivors. Richardson himself acknowledged that his initial mission goals were not achieved, stating he came to realize he would not be the one to transform or shut down the agency. A FEMA spokesperson confirmed the agency remains focused on its core disaster management mission.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI