The Trump administration’s 50% tariff on Canadian imports has raised concerns among hockey equipment retailers, manufacturers, and families about additional price increases for gear that has already become significantly more expensive in recent years.
Hockey equipment prices have climbed substantially. A goaltender’s helmet that cost $400 in 2022 now sells for $1,000, while a chest protector purchased last year for $465 now costs $900. Average hockey sticks are priced around $200, with premium versions reaching $400. Custom goalie equipment setups that once cost $3,300 have also increased, and skate prices have roughly doubled since 2016. These increases have been driven by inflation and previous tariffs on other countries. Industry data shows spending on hockey equipment rose 45.4% from 2020 to 2025, reaching $332.9 million from $228.9 million.
Canada supplies a modest share of imported hockey equipment compared to other nations. According to U.S. International Trade Commission data, Canadian imports represent roughly 8.5% of the hockey equipment market, fourth behind China at 52.7%, Vietnam at 13.2%, and Thailand at 9.5%. However, major manufacturers including Bauer, CCM, and True Hockey still produce custom equipment in Canada. Roustan Hockey, described as the last major hockey stick factory in Canada, has pledged to maintain its manufacturing operations despite the tariff environment.
Economists and industry officials have offered varying assessments of the tariffs’ impact. Some suggest prices may not increase by the full 50% given Canada’s limited market share, with estimates ranging from $50 to $100 in additional costs per item. However, the Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s CEO warned the tariff represents a significant challenge, particularly concerning given that hockey participation in the U.S. has increased 7% over the past three years. Industry observers note that manufacturers may initially absorb costs before raising prices, as occurred with previous tariffs on Chinese goods, potentially delaying the full consumer impact. The ultimate effect depends on whether tariffs are perceived as temporary or permanent, with longer-term expectations likely to trigger faster price increases.
Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source
Article summary produced by Claude AI