Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman

by | Oct 7, 2026 | Technology

Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, stated in a recent interview that the world should tolerate certain harmful outcomes resulting from artificial intelligence advancement to realize the technology’s broader advantages. He specifically mentioned accepting hacks, scams, and other adverse incidents as part of adopting what he characterized as a lighter regulatory framework that allows for wider deployment and user agency.

Altman framed this stance as a fundamental difference between OpenAI’s philosophy and that of competitors like Anthropic, which has advocated for industry deceleration. He argued that the positive applications of AI would substantially outweigh negative consequences by multiple orders of magnitude, making a risk-free deployment approach impractical. His remarks generated immediate pushback from critics, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who objected to leaving safety decisions to a small group of technology leaders, and Gary Marcus, an AI researcher, who characterized Altman’s position as prioritizing corporate profit and influence over public welfare.

The comments come amid ongoing scrutiny of OpenAI’s safety practices. David Robinson, one of the company’s safety researchers, resigned over the weekend, citing insufficient caution during rapid product development cycles. Geoffrey Irving, a former AI safety researcher, highlighted the stakes by suggesting a 50 percent probability of catastrophic outcomes from advanced AI systems, emphasizing the importance of decisions made over the coming years.

Altman’s remarks also included criticism of Elon Musk during a separate interview, continuing a public dispute between the two figures. Musk previously filed a lawsuit against Altman and OpenAI, alleging breach of founding contracts, though a judge and jury dismissed the claim. Meanwhile, OpenAI and other AI companies recently signed an agreement with the Trump administration emphasizing industry self-regulation rather than stringent governmental oversight of AI-related cybersecurity and bioweapon risks.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI