Hegseth wrong to say most non-US Nato forces in Afghanistan did not fight, says No 10

by | Oct 20, 2026 | Politics

Hegseth wrong to say most non-US Nato forces in Afghanistan did not fight, says No 10

Downing Street issued a formal rebuke of Pete Hegseth, the US Defense Secretary, for statements he made regarding the extent of combat involvement by non-American NATO forces during the war in Afghanistan.

Hegseth, who served as a Minnesota Army National Guard instructor in Afghanistan, delivered remarks on Saturday describing his observations at a coalition base in Kabul. He noted that while the headquarters displayed 50 national flags representing allied contributions to the NATO and International Security Assistance Force missions, he characterized most of these contributions as minimal. According to his account, only approximately five nations made substantive contributions, with perhaps one or two engaged in significant combat operations by the conflict’s end. He referenced a common joke among personnel that the acronym ISAF stood for “I Saw Americans Fighting,” suggesting that the burden of combat fell disproportionately on the United States.

The British government disputed this characterization of allied involvement. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Andy Burnham stated that the factual record contradicted Hegseth’s claims. The statement highlighted that personnel from more than 30 nations died in Afghanistan, with 457 British service members among the total death toll. The spokesperson emphasized that thousands of British and allied families made significant sacrifices in the conflict and that these contributions were made in service of collective security. The statement further noted that while the United States suffered approximately two-thirds of total casualties with nearly 2,500 deaths, the losses sustained by other nations represented meaningful participation in the mission.

The dispute reflects ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and its allies regarding assessments of NATO contributions. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had previously issued a more direct criticism of Trump in January, characterizing his prior remarks about NATO troops staying “a little back” from frontlines as “insulting and frankly appalling” and calling for an apology.

Simultaneously, Downing Street sought to distance the UK position from recent Trump administration approaches toward Russia and Ukraine. The government reiterated its consistent support for Ukraine and indicated that this commitment remained “unwavering,” without directly responding to reports that the US president sought to convene peace discussions involving the US, Russia, and China but excluding Ukraine.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI