Target pensions or welfare, not banks, IMF tells John Healey

by | Oct 16, 2026 | Business

Target pensions or welfare, not banks, IMF tells John Healey

The International Monetary Fund has recommended that the UK government pursue spending reductions in pensions and welfare programs instead of increasing taxes on the banking sector, according to comments made by Helge Berger, deputy director of the IMF’s European department. Berger noted that with taxes representing approximately 40 percent of GDP—a historically elevated figure for Britain—it would be prudent to emphasize cuts on the expenditure side. He suggested that if additional revenue were required, property tax or VAT reforms would be preferable options to banking sector levies.

The recommendation comes as the government contemplates raising taxes on financial institutions, a move that has generated significant opposition from industry representatives and international banking concerns. In October, the chief executive of UK Finance submitted research to the chancellor warning that reversing cuts to the bank surcharge—increasing it from 3 percent back to 8 percent—could reduce annual GDP by £1.2 billion in real terms by 2029-30 and lower business lending by approximately £10.4 billion during the same period. Some major international banks have threatened to relocate operations or investment from the UK if tax burdens increase.

However, counterarguments highlight that the Treasury has forgone approximately £6 billion in revenue over three years since the surcharge was reduced in 2023. Simultaneously, major UK banks have reported substantial profits, with the four largest lenders collectively earning £29.2 billion in the first half of the year, allocating nearly half toward shareholder returns. Industry commentator Philip Augar argued that banks are experiencing exceptional conditions and possess sufficient capacity to absorb moderate tax increases of £2 billion to £3 billion annually, noting that historical precedent demonstrates banks rarely follow through on relocation threats.

The debate reflects broader tensions between government fiscal priorities and financial sector interests, with competing claims about the economic consequences of increased taxation on banking operations.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI