‘They poison the population’: how the far right changed Sweden’s conversation

by | Oct 29, 2026 | Religion

‘They poison the population’: how the far right changed Sweden’s conversation

Swedish activists and immigrants are expressing concern that far-right political influence has fundamentally altered the nation’s approach to migration and religious minorities, even as polls suggest the center-left opposition may gain ground in the country’s upcoming general election.

The Sweden Democrats, a far-right party, have leveraged their position supporting the center-right government of Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson to influence policy on migration and crime. During this period, the party has promoted rhetoric linking immigrants and Muslims to societal problems, prompting broader political shifts. According to observers, even opposition parties have moved rightward on these issues, adopting stances previously associated with fringe political actors.

Immigrants and religious minorities report experiencing increased hostility. One Lebanese-born nurse said rhetoric about Islam and religious dress felt dehumanizing, while a Kenyan resident described an atmosphere where non-Swedes feel unwelcome and are reconsidering long-term settlement plans. Mosques have faced regular vandalism, and the country experienced Qur’an burning protests in 2023. A mass shooting in Örebro last year killed 10 people, most with immigrant backgrounds.

Activists working on interfaith dialogue and refugee integration say their efforts have been marginalized. The Ask-a-Muslim campaign, which invites public conversations about Islam, has operated since 2017. Meanwhile, Refugees Welcome Stockholm, which mobilized thousands to assist asylum seekers in 2015, reports reduced funding and influence. Policy changes include reducing annual refugee admissions from 5,000 to 900 and allowing residency permit revocation based on vaguely defined “bad behaviour” criteria.

Those monitoring these developments believe Sweden’s political landscape has shifted substantially, with concerns that policy changes may persist regardless of the election’s outcome. Activists describe the situation as a “Pandora’s box” that has fundamentally altered national discourse on immigration and religious minorities in a country historically known for progressive values on equality and freedom.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI