‘Sick to my stomach’: trans Americans on politicians who spent $183m attacking them for votes

by | Nov 5, 2026 | Top Stories

‘Sick to my stomach’: trans Americans on politicians who spent $183m attacking them for votes

During this year’s midterm elections, Republicans invested approximately $183 million in advertising focused on transgender issues as part of their political strategy. The advertising blitz included roughly 7,000 anti-trans ads in Kansas alone, where incumbent Republican Senator Roger Marshall faced a challenge from Democratic candidate Adam Hamilton. Despite these efforts, Marshall lost his race, and multiple states shifted toward Democratic candidates.

Transgender Americans and political analysts assessed the results as a rejection of anti-trans messaging as an electoral strategy. Alabama elected Allison Montgomery, the state’s first transgender lawmaker, despite her Republican opponent’s critical comments about her identity. Five additional states—Georgia, Washington, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Florida—elected trans and non-binary candidates to state-level positions for the first time. Political science experts noted that the election results suggested anti-trans campaigning did not resonate as a winning strategy with voters concerned primarily about economic issues.

However, the political landscape proved more complicated than a simple partisan divide. Some Democratic candidates also incorporated anti-transgender messaging into their campaigns, with Iowa’s incoming senator Josh Turek and Ohio representative Marcy Kaptur both taking positions opposing transgender inclusion in certain contexts. Political observers suggested that Democratic support for trans rights remained inconsistent, with some candidates distancing themselves from the issue rather than defending it directly.

Trans Americans described varied impacts from the advertising campaign. Residents reported experiencing increased surveillance and social judgment following the ad blitz, while others characterized the spending as fear-mongering that diverted attention from substantive policy concerns. Advocates emphasized that the substantial expenditure on anti-trans messaging far exceeded funding directed toward supporting transgender communities, and they called for political leaders to maintain consistent principles rather than shifting positions based on perceived electoral advantage.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI