Israeli President Isaac Herzog has directed Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party and a former military chief of staff, to attempt forming a government following elections that left no political alliance with a Knesset majority. Eisenkot has been given 28 days to accomplish this task, with a possible 14-day extension, after which the opportunity would pass to an alternative leader, likely Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, or new elections would be called.
Unlike Netanyahu’s previous governing coalitions, Eisenkot is expected to face significant difficulty securing a parliamentary majority. Political observers note he may need to negotiate with ultra-Orthodox parties, particularly the United Torah Judaism Party, which has distanced itself from Netanyahu. Additionally, securing support from parties representing Palestinian citizens of Israel could prove necessary, though this approach carries political risks. Eisenkot emerged as his opposition bloc’s leader only days before the October 27 elections, and the coalition has struggled with unclear messaging and coordination.
Eisenkot’s potential rise represents a sharp contrast to Netanyahu’s long political dominance. Born in Tiberias to parents from Morocco, Eisenkot rose through military ranks before entering politics and serving in the national unity government formed following the October 7, 2023 attacks. He has experienced personal loss related to the subsequent conflict, with multiple family members killed in Gaza operations. His public persona contrasts with Netanyahu’s polished image, characterized as both “menschy” and “schlumpy” by observers.
A critical challenge for any new Israeli leadership involves repairing the country’s standing in the United States, where public perception has declined significantly. Senior analyst Aaron David Miller noted that Eisenkot’s discomfort with public appearances and limited English proficiency could complicate efforts to rebuild this relationship. However, analysts also suggest Eisenkot’s military background and steady demeanor may appeal to Israeli voters seeking normalcy and consistent governance.
Despite these considerations, Palestinian advocates express skepticism about whether Eisenkot’s leadership would alter fundamental policies affecting Palestinian citizens. Critics note his association with the Dahiyeh Doctrine, which endorses disproportionate force against civilian populations, raising questions about whether his government would meaningfully address the disparities in rights between Jewish and Palestinian Israelis.
Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source
Article summary produced by Claude AI