Who determines Iran’s fighting and negotiating position amid US threats?

by | Nov 4, 2026 | World

Who determines Iran’s fighting and negotiating position amid US threats?

Mediation efforts involving Qatar and Pakistan are underway to prevent further escalation between Iran and the United States, following Israeli and American airstrikes on February 28 that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other senior officials. President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that his administration had received “certain powers” from the new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, to conduct negotiations, though he declined to specify the scope of this authority. However, analysts and officials emphasize that any agreement requires backing from Iran’s military and security establishment.

Decision-making authority in Iran operates through a structured framework that includes the Supreme National Security Council, which comprises military commanders, government ministers, parliamentary leadership, and judicial officials. While the supreme leader retains ultimate authority, the council votes on major decisions first. Recently, the position of SNSC secretary has gained prominence due to its coordinating role; Mohsen Rezaei, a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander, has held this position since early August. When US Vice President JD Vance sent a letter to Iran, he addressed it to Rezaei rather than to the president or parliament speaker, reflecting the apparent centrality of this security-focused role in negotiations.

Tensions arose following the collapse in June of a memorandum of understanding that had briefly paused hostilities and lifted maritime restrictions on Iranian ports. After Iran accused the United States of violating the agreement’s terms, the IRGC launched attacks on three vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. This prompted international speculation about whether military factions had acted independently, though IRGC officials later characterized the strikes as a coordinated response approved by higher authorities. The breakdown highlighted divisions within Iran’s government structure, with some observers suggesting hardline security elements wielded considerable influence over escalatory decisions.

Current mediation discussions involve Iran’s seven-point plan for ending the conflict and reopening maritime passages, with demands that extend beyond nuclear issues to encompass broader security arrangements. Iran’s foreign ministry continues diplomatic contacts through international channels, but Rezaei has not yet responded to Vance’s letter despite reportedly detecting a positive shift in tone. Analysts note that the concentration of decision-making power within military and security institutions reflects the country’s prioritization of defense concerns amid the ongoing conflict.

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Article summary produced by Claude AI